Talk:Surcoat

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Textile arts Low‑importance

	Clothing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Textile artsWikipedia:WikiProject Textile artsTemplate:WikiProject Textile artsTextile arts
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To do

Latest comment: 19 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

(todo: Find an image of knight wearing a surcoat; need something on the female medieval surcoat)

Is it not totally contrary to logic to illustrate a medieval article of clothing by means of a nineteenth century picture. I'll try to find a contemporary pic, but we'd be better off with nothing at all rather than a pre-Raphaelite pre-concept of what he thought a surcoat should/may have looked like. Please will "todos" try to do the same. Thanks. Nick Michael 15:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

That's not even a surcoat. That's a tabard. I have also removed the link http://members.aol.com/dargolyt/TheForge/surcoat.html from the page as this page references a historically incorrect website created with the purpose of illustrating the DragonRealms role-playing game. Definitely not a scholarly citation. --SunWuKong 01:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have added a nice pic I think, rather hedging my bets on Sir On-the-right in the caption. But I think both garments could fairly be called surcoats.

I'm rather dubious about the remaining external link which shows a "robe royale" , a "cotehardie" and various other gowns, but nothing that would I think normally be called a surcoat by costume historians. Johnbod 02:35, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

To do