Talk:SuperClash
Add topicLatest comment: 19 years ago by TJ Spyke in topic SuperClash 3 - Title unification
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SuperClash article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
SuperClash 3 - Title unification
[edit]Hello, the article currently reads This match was to unify the AWA and WCCW Titles. If I understood the DVD The Spectacular Legacy of the AWA correctly it was originally planned The King Lawler looses the title somewhen in the AWA-area, but since he wasn't paid (even by now) his salaries from the SuperClash 3 he never appeared on AWA programme, house shows or the like. The AWA wihout notifying him stripped the title from him and gave it to the winner of a Battle Royal. -- Bardnet 10:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- The titles were unified, the unification just didn't last long. This usually doesn't happen in wrestling, but happens a lot in boxing (they called titles unified just because one person holds both). TJ Spyke 02:17, 14 June 2007 (UTC)