Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Sullivan Square station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Reify-tech in topic Location map

Track information

[edit]

Track information: (comment by User:SPUI in 2006)

Note for the curious: those links no longer quite work, but the site does and the images are still there. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:59, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Location map

[edit]

The location map in the info box is a little odd, in that the station is at the very edge of the map. Could another map be used, which shows a little more of the area surrounding Sullivan Square station? Seeing downtown Boston is useful for orientation, but it doesn't need to be at the center of location map. Reify-tech (talk) 22:06, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

I spread that map around to all station articles that were on it, from just a few downtown. I didn't find more maps that could be used that meet WP's copyright policies. More time and effort could turn such location maps up. Lentower (talk) 23:29, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
That map is just from openstreetmap. Another map could easily be made and coded. I've never been a big fan of the infobox maps, though, because the clickdown map from the coordinates is superior. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:19, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
I believe both are best, as the ways readers experience and use Wikipedia are quite varied. It's useful to many readers to have a small map visible in the article. Also I don't get a "clickdown" (popup? popdown?) map on either place where there is a coordinate link on the page (browser or setting difference?), but get redirected to a page that lists links to maps on different web sights with no map on that page. Is there any reason to put a reader through all that unless they want to use it? Lentower (talk) 22:41, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
I agree that having both alternatives is useful. The infobox map is good for quick orientation at a glance, while sending the geo-coordinates to a separate and specialized map program allows in-depth exploration, but can be a distraction from the article for a reader who doesn't need this. Also, I suspect that many Wikipedia readers have never made use of the geo-coordinates, and were baffled by what they got when they clicked on them. Reify-tech (talk) 03:51, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply