Talk:Stephen Rademaker

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Virginia: Albemarle County Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albemarle County, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Poorly source, non notable controversy

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I removed some material that doesn't seem that notable. --Malerooster (talk) 14:44, 14 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Should his political views and accomplishments be noted?

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I see the Center for Media and Democracy SOURCEWATCH reports Mr. Rademaker benefited from a controversial deal he negotiated while at the State Department and supported the Iraq weapons of mass destruction theory while at the State Department. Among his many op-eds was one for Federalist Society.

Should his conservative political viewpoint or controversies like these be included? https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Stephen_G._Rademaker https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Stephen_G._Rademaker CommsKathy (talk) 23:12, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Poorly source, non notable controversy

Should his political views and accomplishments be noted?