Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horse racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Horse racing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horse racingWikipedia:WikiProject Horse racingTemplate:WikiProject Horse racingHorse racing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DogsWikipedia:WikiProject DogsTemplate:WikiProject DogsDogs
Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I propose that Starting gate and Starting barrier be merged. They are basically about the same device, and very similar in content, though the differences are enough that a straight redirect of one to the other is not advised. I take no position on which title to keep, it's a US English versus a UK English question, and one I hope can be resolved with good faith discussion and consensus. My only issue is that it is clearly unnecessary to have two near-identical articles. I suggest perhaps seeing which article already has the most incoming links and/or which will be the easier edit to perform a merge. Montanabw(talk)00:47, 1 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
AGREE. Perfect candidates for merger. I am easy about the naming so long as all variations - gate/barrier/stalls get a mention Peaky76 (talk) 17:23, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Not sure if it's just me, but it looks like a Sterliline fan or employee has added some company propaganda to this page, and is using it as a bit of a backlink farm. I'm not well versed enough to know if this is suitable or not, but not a fan of the vibes
It's not just you. You're right about the promotional content, it should go. I added a template message so it gets found out easier, but haven't got the time to edit the paragraphs myself. Jóna Bók (talk) 23:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
_part_2.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}