Talk:Stackhousia monogyna

Plants Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Stackhousia monogyna is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Date accuracy

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Article states it was named in 1861, then renamed in 1805 - 60 years prior. 58.109.90.252 (talk) 19:42, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Don't merged stackhousia tryonii

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Stackhousia tryonii is considered its own species. Stackhousia monogyna and stackhousia tryonii were misapplied synonyms and are considered separate species. Canofcatfood (talk) 06:31, 9 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Date accuracy

Don't merged stackhousia tryonii