Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Stacey Patton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Newacademic90291 in topic Should there be a 'controversies' section?

Should there be a 'controversies' section?

[edit]

Just wondering if anyone thinks there should be a 'controversies' section in this article, perhaps referencing Patton's penchant for publishing racist anti-white screeds like this one: https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/kyle-rittenhouse-proof-white-women-183033289.html  Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.95.149.108 (talk) 20:26, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yahoo has deleted your link. It's archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20211124191140/https://news.yahoo.com/kyle-rittenhouse-proof-white-women-183033289.html
I support your proposal.
On November 15, 2021, the judge dropped the illegal gun possession charge against Kyle Rittenhouse because his gun was long-barrel and not short-barrel, which made it legal for him to possess. Source: https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/judge-dismisses-weapons-charge-at-kyle-rittenhouse-murder-trial/2684765/
However, 9 days later, on November 24, 2021, Yahoo News published the above writing by Patton, where she falsely wrote that Rittenhouse's possession of the gun was “illegal."
This constitutes defamation, and is the reason that Yahoo deleted the piece.
The fact that Patton is a journalism professor makes this especially notable. If anyone should know enough to not commit this kind of defamation, it should be her.
Baxter329 (talk) 20:04, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
I believe there has to be criticism published in what's considered a "notable source," but y'know, having just read a bizarre screed where she claims that white supremacy is epigenetically translated & asking her for evidence is a racist indignity that white PhDs would not be subject to (she conveniently doesn't clarify her PhD is not in biology) I would not be against it.2601:984:8101:9B70:A05F:33F1:F27C:1865 (talk) 05:20, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
It seems that there are many editors in Wiki that don’t like it when truth which makes people with the same opinion as the subject, look bad. I added Stacey Payton’s own rant against those she seems racist and how someone (not her of course) should attack them like John Brown did, which means killing them. The person who “fixed” my edit said it caused an error, and the fix was to completely remove the information that made Patton look bad. Rediranch (talk) 15:43, 24 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
definitely should be, given that this charming individual just dropped a substack article titled ‘Dear Jeff Metcalf: Your Son Is Dead Because You Failed to Teach Him That Black Boys Have Boundaries’
this woman is not a human being ~2026-34010-66 (talk) 04:06, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
That is noteworthy, but behind a paywall. It should go in the wiki if an editor knows how to put it in. Newacademic90291 (talk) 06:31, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply