Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Squirrel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by LizardJr8 in topic Semi-protected edit request on 14 August 2026

Damn good article

[edit]

I have followed the squirrel and Sciuridae article development and I just reread this article for the first time in awhile.

I would just like to congratulate the various authors and editors on a very good job. It is well written. It covers the most important aspects of the subject and the combination of the two articles, Squirrel and Sciuridae, with the addition of the squirrel DAB did a good job on handling the semantic issues related to title and subject of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davefoc (talk • contribs) 20:23, 13 April 201 (UTC)0

Semi-protected edit request on 27 October 2025

[edit]

Under See Also, remove or add qualifiers to the claim linking the consumption of squirrel brains to vCJD. The linked article on vCJD provides sources dismissing the claim as myth, and addresses the specific 2018 news articles also linked there. Louscher.hunter (talk) 22:07, 27 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

7&6=thirteen, would you mind taking a look at this, since you were the one who added this originally? Slomo666 (talk) 22:15, 27 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Not done for now: I cannot verify the claim as I cannot read the article right now Slomo666 (talk) 22:16, 27 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Slomo666 Louscher.hunter See WP:Linkrot. It said what I said it said at the time. WP:Verifiable; Could be qualified if you have a separate source. See also WP:truth. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question / discrepancy on "date from the Eocene epoch"

[edit]

From the top section, "The earliest known fossilized squirrels date from the Eocene epoch...". This cites Rodents by Emily H Kay and Hopi E Hoekstra. However, from their paper it says "Some of the earliest fossils collected in Wyoming and Europe suggested that rodents evolved in Laurasia late in the Paleocene, 55–60 million years ago." That is in reference to rodents in general, not specifically squirrels. However, it goes on to say "Rodent diversification is documented throughout the Eocene (55–34 million years ago), and by 20 million years ago, many of today's recognizable rodent families had emerged." So this citation is not specifically saying squirrels date back to Eocene and could have subsequently developed before or during the Oligocene era. If I am reading the article correctly at least! The citation doesn't link to a copy of the article so I am using: https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(08)00319-9. If anyone could sanity / fact check this I would appreciate it!

Semi-protected edit request on 14 August 2026

[edit]

Squirrel nests, known as dreys, are typically spherical bundles of leaves, twigs, and moss built 20 to 40 feet high in the forks of tree branches. They can also use natural tree cavities as dens. Squirrels birth litters twice a year (spring and summer), and sometimes turn to attics or chimneys for shelter ~2026-44641-57 (talk) 13:49, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want made. Please also specify where the additional text is to be placed. LizardJr8 (talk) 15:52, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply