Talk:Speediance Life Technology Inc.

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 January 2026. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Speediance Life Technology Inc. article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Artificial Intelligence Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests: Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess: Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit: Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox: Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain: Portal:Companies
Stubs: Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other:
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Health and fitness Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Award and controversy sections

Latest comment: 8 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Regarding this restoration, I removed the "Awards" section because it is sourced to unreliable sources and to the companies that gave the awards:

https://www.bignewsnetwork.com/news/278594979/from-kickstarter-to-global-recognition-the-growth-of-shenzhen-fitness-tech-innovators – the page says the content is from "Busines NewsWire", which is not a reliable source.
https://metapress.com/connected-fitness-beyond-cardio-bringing-strength-training-into-the-smart-home-era/ – metapress.com is a blog. It is not a reliable source.
https://fitdesignawards.com/winners/ – this is not an independent reliable source since it is from the company that gave the award.
https://www.globaltechaward.com/ – this is not an independent reliable source since it is from the company that gave the award.
https://www.gadgetyawards.com/best-of-ifa-2025/ – this is not an independent reliable source since it is from the company that gave the award.

If the awards were significant, they would have been reported by an independent reliable source. Since no independent reliable sources covered them, it is undue weight to include the awards in the article.

I removed the "Controversies" section because it is sourced to unreliable sources or primary sources (court documents) which make inclusion of the content undue:

https://dockets.justia.com/docket/texas/txedce/2:2023cv00517/226017 – this is a court document.
https://insider.fitt.co/tonal-sues-chinese-rival-speediance/ – fitt.co is not a reliable source.
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/51311064/TONAL_SYSTEMS,_INC_v_SHENZHEN_SPEEDIANCE_LIVING_TECHNOLOGY_CO,_LTD – this is a court document.

If the court case was significant, it would have been reported by an independent reliable source. Since no independent reliable sources covered it, it is undue weight to include it in the article. Cunard (talk) 10:13, 1 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for this explanation, I would try to be vigilant next time. RaynorRaider (talk) 00:10, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Award and controversy sections