Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Smit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 18 years ago by Ceyockey
Importance=mid based on frequency >0.3% in 1947 Netherlands. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Collating frequency information

[edit]

Collecting here prior to posting to main article.

  • United States, 1990. "Search names from 1990 Census" (Database search result). United States Census Bureau. 2000-09-07. Retrieved 2008-03-05. NAME (last):Smit ; %FREQ:0.001 ; CUMM FREQ:73.627 ; RANK:12,725 (reformatted quote)
  • Scotland, 1999/2000/2001. Not among the top 100; http://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/files/01surnames_tablea2.pdf.
  • Scotland, 1995. Not among the top 100; http://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/statistics/publications-and-data/popular-names/surnames.html
  • UK, 1881 and 1998. Longley, Paul. "Smit". SPLINT Project, University College London. The National Trust. Retrieved 2008-03-05. {{cite web}}: External link in |work= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
    • 1998: rank 14,940; 6 occurrences per million people
    • 1881: rank 22,271; 1 occurrence per million people
    • this source states the origin as "Imported From Abroad; European; German"; also, the ethnic categorization is "German or Dutch"
    • —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceyockey (talkcontribs) 12:05, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
    • Comparative frequencies (1998): New Zealand > Australia ~ Canada (each >10x more frequent than in Great Britain) >> United States > Northern Ireland > Great Britain > Republic of Ireland --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:22, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dstribution within Netherlands

[edit]

See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anthroponymy#Skirting the boundaries of original research for discussion relating to this (experimental) section. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:12, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply