Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Smart card application protocol data unit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by An9elFish in topic Outdated references?

cheef.ru server fault?

[edit]

There appears an issue with the cheef.ru server, which hosts all current refs for this page. Possibly a temporary issue, but I wanted to note it today and if not corrected we should remove them and hopefully replace with other references. Jocularjosh (talk) 16:53, 14 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

It's 2010-10-10, and the links seem to be working. Guy Harris (talk) 19:16, 10 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

APDUs that have nothing to do with smartcards

[edit]

The term APDU also exists in several other protocols. I think it is a more general term. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.91.83.251 (talk) 15:31, 21 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

You are entirely correct. In the OSI reference model, an APDU would just be a protocol data unit for an arbitrary application layer protocol, whether the protocol has anything to do with smartcards or not. Guy Harris (talk) 19:15, 10 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps this article should be renamed "Smartcard application protocol data unit" or similar? Mitch Ames (talk) 12:15, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
That would make sense. Guy Harris (talk) 06:57, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Moved. Mitch Ames (talk) 13:13, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Outdated references?

[edit]

The content of http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_ics/catalogue_detail_ics.htm?csnumber=36134 states at that standard has been withdrawn. The superceding standard is found at http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_ics/catalogue_detail_ics.htm?csnumber=54550.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.89.58.131 (talk) 14:22, 30 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

The ISO standards are revised almost every year. The revision mentioned above was superseded already. I recommend linking to the original version because many devices support that version. Moreover, it's good to know when this standard was introduced. Finding out the latest version is easy. So, I don't think we should spend time updating the link every so often. An9elFish (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply