Talk:Slut
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Slut article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| This article was nominated for deletion on 5 January 2010. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Semi-protected edit request on 4 August 2023
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Slut noun 1.DEROGATORY a prostitute with standards and decorum. "That man is such a slut with his skinny little waist I would hold it on my waist, what a slutty silly man."06:37, 4 August 2023 (UTC)06:37, 4 August 2023 (UTC)06:37, 4 August 2023 (UTC)~ 2601:197:B80:F60:4DD5:C01E:E24A:C23C (talk) 06:37, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. 💜 melecie talk - 08:10, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
suggested edit
[edit]"The modern sense of 'sexually promiscuous woman' dates to at least 1450.[10]" This is in error. The source, etymonline, indicates the sexually promiscuous woman denotation is not attested until 1966. --Gwynwas (talk) 14:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Article title italicized
[edit]Can anyone tell me why the article title is italicized? Is it because the term is pejorative? I couldn't find it mentioned on a brief look-through the MOS. Thanks! 00:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC) SigPig2 (talk) 00:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @SigPig2, this was almost two years ago so I'm pinging you. The title is italicized because the article is about the word slut more than the concept "slut". See use–mention distinction for a general description and MOS:WORDSASWORDS for the MOS guidance. —Myceteae🍄🟫 (talk) 19:14, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
"Manwhore" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Manwhore has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 15 § Manwhore until a consensus is reached. —Myceteae🍄🟫 (talk) 19:11, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
Language fix request
[edit]Please correct "predominately" to "predominantly". See Wiktionary entries if unsure. ~2026-28292-21 (talk) 11:32, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
- C-Class Feminism articles
- Low-importance Feminism articles
- WikiProject Feminism articles
- C-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- C-Class Sex work articles
- High-importance Sex work articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- C-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- C-Class Gender studies articles
- Low-importance Gender studies articles
- WikiProject Gender studies articles
- C-Class Discrimination articles
- Low-importance Discrimination articles
- WikiProject Discrimination articles

