Talk:Similarity
Add topicLatest comment: 17 years ago by Michael Hardy in topic Early comments
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | Material from Similarity was split out into Similarity (signal processing) on 01:42, 5 December 2024 from this version. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
Early comments
[edit]Kku, I suppose the word "symmetry" should be deleted or, at least, moved to another place in the definition. And I think that you gave a definition of similarity which is restricted to some areas. Given the differences between Wikipedia and Wiktionary, I actually think that your whole introduction sould perhaps be removed. Another argument is that disambiguation pages should just have the links to the disambiguated pages. Say something! Velho 19:57, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Mathematics notation in the introduction is appalling! —DIV (128.250.80.15 (talk) 04:35, 11 April 2008 (UTC))
- The notation style was not the only thing that was appalling. The comments on probability were in the wrong place in the article. Then if you actually read what they said, they were idiotic nonsense. They didn't quite last two years; they were put there in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Similarity&diff=169247873&oldid=155770217 this edit]. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:46, 23 July 2009 (UTC)