Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Signal averaging

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 years ago by 2600:1702:2DD0:C4C0:97C:E50:637E:B5EA

According to the top paragraph, by averaging several signals "...S/N, will be increased, ideally in proportion to the square root of the number of measurements", which is indeed a common conclusion.

However, according to the calculations below and using the given definition of SNR as the power of the signal over the noise variance, averaging n signals increases the S/N by n, not the square root of n: "...averaging n realizations of the same, uncorrelated noise reduces noise power by a factor of n."

I believe the statement that the SNR is increased by the square root of n arises from using the RMS of the signal over the RMS of the noise as the definition of SNR, rather than the power. Perhaps this could be clarified.

2600:1702:2DD0:C4C0:97C:E50:637E:B5EA (talk) 23:44, 19 August 2018 (UTC)Reply