Talk:Shuttle bus

Discussion for english variant-discussion open till draft approval

British English- The article was created with british english, in additon the article for Airport bus a type of shuttle bus is written in british english NotOrrio (talk) 10:14, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

this discussion will officially close in favour of keeping british english there were no contests and I had almost singhandedly written the entire draft in british english NotOrrio (talk) 01:39, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Source reviewing

Many of the sources were considerd unreliable because they were either promotional or other wikis i checked through it and the only source i found that didnt fall under such category was Australia Bus and Coach I will crete a full assesement table to see find sources NotOrrio (talk) 10:41, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Source assesment

1.http://www.wikimotors.org/what-is-a-shuttle-bus.htm|

Pros:

-Does present a lot of information

Cons:

-Unreliable- wikisite

Overall Grade:

Unreliable: should be replaced

2. https://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm39.htm

Pros:

-Counts towards GNG

-Independant: Run by an independant research insitute

-Reliable: Run by a research insitute

-Sigcov: Main topic is about shuttle buses

Cons:

-Website looks outdated

-Website information may be outdated

Overall Grade:

Good: Website is reliable and counts towards GNG, however looks outdated and information may be outdaded

3. https://www.einnews.com/pr_news/605891387/our-research-report-on-airport-shuttle-bus-market-offers-information-that-is-necessary-for-the-development-of-the-market

Pros:

-Counts towards GNG

-Independant: News article

-Reliable: News article

-Sigcov: Main topic is about the increased market demand of airport buses a type of shuttle bus (maybe partial though)

Cons:

-Couldn't find any

Overall Grade:

Good-Perfect: Couldn't find any cons with this website and the website shows GNG

4.https://www.ptv.vic.gov.au/route/

Pros:

-Reliable Website (run by victorian state government)

Cons:

-Doesnt really serve any purpose but to prove route 601 exists

Overall Grade:

Alright: Reliable source used to prove route 601 exists, however can possibly replaced with an article from monash university about the route instead for example about raid route

5. https://translink.com.au/sites/default/files/acquiadam-assets/timetables/170109-134%2C135%2C145%2C155.pdf

Pros:

-Reliable Website (run by queensland state government)

Cons:

-Doesnt really serve any purpose but to prove route 134 exists

Overall Grade:

Alright: Reliable source used to prove route 134 exists, however can possibly replaced with an article from griffith university about the route instead for example about said route

6. https://www.busnews.com.au/industry-news/1908/skybus-parent-relaunches-as-kinetic

Pros:

-Reliable Website (major australian article about bus transport)

-Does talk about skybus the shuttle bus mentioned in the section

-Potentially partial GNG (indepdant bus article, does talk about skybus an example of a shuttle bus)

Cons:

-Doesnt talk out skybus (the shuttle bus mentioned) alot

Overall Grade:

Alright-good: Source is reliable however main purpose seems to be to prove it exists could be considerd partial for sigcov however I am unsure

7. https://www.welcomepickups.com/paris/charles-de-gaulle-airport-to-city/

Pros:

-Mentions the bus in detail

Cons:

-Unreliable promotional

Overall Grade:

Unreliable- is promotional and should be replaced

8. https://tabiparislax.com/en/roissy-bus-complete-guide/

Pros:

-Mentions the bus in detail

Cons:

-Unreliable promotional

Overall Grade:

Unreliable- is promotional and should be replaced

9.https://www.mylondon.news/lifestyle/travel/heathrow-londons-most-expensive-bus-23478475

Pros:

-Mentions the bus in detail

Cons:

-Unreliable promotional

Overall Grade:

Unreliable- is promotional and should be replaced

10.https://www.busnews.com.au/industry-news/2212/kinetic-continues-transport-investments-in-tasmania-with-new-depot

Pros:

-Reliable

-Mentions the bus in detail

-Can potentially satsify gng partially (both independnant and reliable)

Cons:

-Not much mentioning of the shuttle bus

-In terms of sigcov is half way at best

Overall Grade:

Good- Article contains alot of information and is reliable

11.https://www.discoverlosangeles.com/travel/the-guide-to-lax-flyaway%C2%AE-bus-service

Pros:

-Mentions the bus in detail

Cons:

-Unreliable promotional

Overall Grade:

Unreliable- is promotional and should be replaced

Summary-

Overall there were a few problems with the sources, the major one is that sources 1,7,8,9 and 11 are unreliable and are in dire need of replacement, sources 4 and 5 are reliable but could be replaced with better sources. Notability is doing good with 2 sources showing full notability with 2 potentially being partially notable would likely require 1 or 2 sources though before showing that this article is notable NotOrrio (talk) 12:23, 13 December 2022 (UTC)