Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Shrinking space

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Kphoek in topic Metacompact and normal is Shrinking?

As far as I know in no common textbook on topology the term "shrinking space" is in use. Conversely, the theory of locally convex spaces uses this term in connection with spaces of a specific type. Read more: H. Jarchow , "Locally convex spaces" , Teubner (1981) Schojoha (talk) 17:10, 17 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Metacompact and normal is Shrinking?

[edit]

"Thus, every normal metacompact space is a shrinking space. In particular, every paracompact space is a shrinking space." I am not sure whether these two statements are correct. As for the second statement, a paracompact space need not be normal (paracompact does not include the Hausdorff-property in Wikipedia!). If one adds the Hausdorff-property (or more generally the preregularity), this becomes true. EDIT: The first statement is now clear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.225.129.103 (talk) 15:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I agree, the claim that "every paracompact space is a shrinking space" is wrong as per the definition of paracompactness on Wikipedia. (The correct hypothesis should be "paracompact Hausdorff space", see e.g. Lemma 41.6 of Munkres' Topology.) Kphoek (talk) 18:04, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply