Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Shivalli Brahmins

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Raj2004 in topic Fisher woman reference

Are the Shivalli Deshasthas?

[edit]

We would like to use the Upanayanam picture in this article for Deshastha Brahmin. But the picture is not admissible unless we prove it's a Deshastha boy's upanayanam. Can you confirm or deny that the Shivalli Brahmins are Deshastha like the Madhva Brahmins from North Karnataka? Thanks. Zuggernaut (talk) 05:49, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

no they are not.11:28, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Sri sir Vishwesha Theertha Swamiji.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Sri sir Vishwesha Theertha Swamiji.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:12, 18 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Truth about shivallis

[edit]
"It is currently thought that the lowly role amongst the latter was due to an attempt at maintaining line purity by the first Shivali Brahmin men who migrated to the South and married local (non-Brahmin) fisher women." This statement is the real fact  and shivallis are really born in this way from moger/marakalas/fisherwoman and also other caste woman.So they are having kulanamas like baris of shoodras with names ending with aaya,naaya ,thaaya, laaya.e.g shoodra name paduvannaya is also there in shivallis.See the similarities like kotiyannaya became kotian ,saliyannaya became saliyan similarly this kulanamas. It indicates from where and which caste we shivallis married for the first time. Refer Tulunadu for this. There was no need of removing the statement-- shreesha kedilaya   Preceding unsigned comment added by Shivashambo (talkcontribs) 05:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Fisher woman reference

[edit]

I removed this statement "On the fourth day there is a symbolic representation of fish catching in brides house to represent the actual origins of shivalli women from mogers (i.e. fisherwoman)and other castes.[1]. " There is no academic reference supporting this statement.Raj2004 (talk) 22:50, 12 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

References


[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shivalli Brahmins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply