Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Shipyard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Themailguy. Peer reviewers: Rickyediting, Duke.met.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Comments

[edit]

I edited out some absurd looking quotes around the words 'defense enterprise' regarding Northrop-Grumman. Cynical Scare Quotes are hardly an NPOV thing. Doesn't matter whether the topic is related. - Kade 06:33, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This article needs heavy revision. It seems to be heavily dependent on people with special interests supplying information about the country or yard with which they are most familiar. As a result, the section listing "Prominent Dockyards and Shipyards" is so far out of proportion as to be positively misleading. (For example, you would get the idea that the US is a prominent shipbuilding country and China is not.) The article on "Shipbuilding" is much more balanced. In the present article, the list section should be deleted with a link referring to the separate article "List of shipbuilders and shipyards". Mstarli (talk) 07:00, 11 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Missing a few important yards

[edit]

The South East Asia section completely ignores several important yards in Singapore which is a major shipbuilding nation as well.

182.19.157.251 (talk) 15:49, 28 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Shipyard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:28, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced and evaluative descriptions in "South Asia and the Middle East"

[edit]

The entries under South Asia and the Middle East are almost entirely uncited, and several use evaluative wording that would need a source to stand. FMC Dockyard is called "one of the largest shipyards in Bangladesh"; Western Marine Shipyard "a leading shipyard in Bangladesh"; Khulna Shipyard "the oldest shipyard in Bangladesh"; Ananda Shipyard and Shipways "one of the largest shipyards in Bangladesh"; and Pipavav Shipyard "the leading, modern and largest engineering facility". Superlatives of that kind need inline citations per WP:V, and read as puffery without them.

I am not going to edit the section myself, and I want to be transparent about why. I have a conflict of interest: I am an owner of Radiant Shipyard, a Bangladeshi shipyard, which makes every company named above a competitor. WP:COI advises editors not to edit articles concerning their competitors, and removing or rewriting entries about rival firms is not something I should be doing, whether or not the material is currently sourced. My disclosure is at User:Shahir80.

Raising it here so that uninvolved editors can decide whether to source, trim or tag the section. I have no preference as to the outcome, and to be clear I am not requesting that my own company be added to the list. Shahir80 (talk) 05:38, 31 August 2026 (UTC)Reply