Talk:Shekl-e Shah
Add topicLatest comment: 2 months ago by KJP1 in topic GA review
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Shekl-e Shah was nominated as a Art and architecture good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 19, 2026, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
GA review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Shekl-e Shah/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: The.shahab (talk · contribs) 17:10, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: KJP1 (talk · contribs) 16:10, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
Quick fail
[edit]I will pick this one up, but it is going to have to be a Quick Fail. The issues are:
- 1. Prose 1(a) - the prose needs some work. While this could be fixed fairly quickly, the second issue likely can't:
- 2. Verifiable 2(a)/(b) - the article lacks sufficient, appropriate sourcing. Specifically:
- The first paragraph of History is cited only to the online Britannica but I am unable to find much of the content in the source;
- The second paragraph of History is uncited;
- Source 5 - this doesn't appear to work;
- Source 6 - this doesn't look very Reliable to me;
- Access- - this section is completely uncited.
I appreciate there are two foreign language sources I cannot access, but they would not address the issues identified above. There are issues with 3 of the 8 sources used and, as noted, large parts are not sourced at all. KJP1 (talk) 16:10, 19 May 2026 (UTC)