Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Shas Pollak

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Jfdwolff in topic Layout of Talmud

Article life

[edit]

I have heard the tales about pin-thru-Talmud trick since childhood, but always as a hearsay with no names named. So having read in wikipedia that Pinchas Hirschsprung did the "pin test" I naturally decided to double-check it. I failed and I tagged the corresponding statement with citation request. Googling for "pin test" I came to the term "Shass Pollak" and subsequent googling gave a number of contradicting descriptions with apparently a singe reputable reference, the one to George Stratton, so I finally decided to go to the library and look up the original text. Hence the article.

Notice that Stratton did not test Shass Pollak himself, so it is still a hearsay. One of the witnesses describes a case which smacks of show trick. Another witness recollects from long time ago. So I am inclined to believe that Shass Pollak is nothing but a pretty legend, but I haven't found any critical discussion or first-hand account so far. A serious reason to doubt is I find it difficult to believe for precious books allowed to be pricked with pins in order to astound goyim (or even Jews). Laudak (talk) 20:30, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Layout of Talmud

[edit]

The description of the layout of a page of Talmud is wrong. The text in the centre of the page consists of both Mishna and Gemara. The surrounding commentaries are of a much later date (> 1000 CE). Has anyone got access to the original source to see if Stratton made the same error? JFW | T@lk 16:49, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply