Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Sharee Miller

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by 128.63.16.47 in topic Notability

Notability

[edit]

I can't provide a reference at the moment, but I do know that this case has been featured on either Court TV (Forensic Files?) or A&E (American Justice?). I've seen it multiple times. So for what my memories are worth, I'd say this is notable, although the article right now doesn't seem to do a great job of explaining that. keɪɑtɪk flʌfi (talk) 21:07, 23 June 2008 (UTC) - not the article's authorReply

There is a fair bit from a google search. I'd agree that she could be a notable person. Just need some reliable sources. Nk.sheridan   Talk 21:18, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I removed the speedy and the unref tag as the article has references and esablished enough notability to avoid an A7. However, the notability is problematic due to wp:blp1e. There's a strong probability that the article will get deleted through an afd. To avoid deletion, I would advise that the context of the artice be reformatted so that the subject is the event, not the person, therby avoiding any [[wp:blp1e] problems. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 21:23, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

There is a transcript of her appeal in 2003 here which might be useful in reformatting the article to relate to the event rather than the person. Nk.sheridan   Talk 21:30, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

There is a section (in this Wikipedia article) "In popular culture" (if it didn't already exist in June 2008) which answers the questions about Forensic Files and A&E. I recently added that Forensic Files reference.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.47 (talk) 15:43, 11 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

content in isolation

[edit]

There's a lot of case law citation in the update section that would be easier to understand if there were a little more exposition as to what was actually at issue in the related cases; perhaps some external references if the cases aren't in WP would be suitable, but at this particular point in time, there's a bunch of names thrown into the article with no explanation as to why the underlying information is relevant. Absurdist1968 (talk) 09:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply