Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article was nominated for deletion on 7 July 2025. The result of the discussion was withdrawn.
This article was nominated for deletion on 29 February 2024. The result of the discussion was delete.
A fact from Serenity Cox appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 August2025(check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Comment: Requesting another reviewer since I feel the previous reviewer overlooked the new details added and I respectfully request that reviewer to pass on reviewing this page since they originally championed for this page to be deleted previously, it feels a little like a vendetta at this point SanDiegoDan (talk) 20:50, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Comment: See WP:COI. See also WP:BLP. Statements, starting with the date of birth, need to be sourced or removed. Even more so, unsourced, promotional statements such as "With a growing presence and a fearless approach to her career, she continues to push boundaries and redefine success in the industry. " Greenman (talk) 07:59, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago6 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: DYKcheck will claim this is 18 days old when it's actually just under seven: This was moved to mainspace on 26 June, and lasted a smidge over six days before I WP:BLARed it, which was reverted four and a half days later, and I just withdrew the AfD I sent it to straight afterward (see my explanation there). I also intend on expanding American MILF using the existing QPQ (I reviewed two articles). Also, remind me to organise either a closer crop of the image or one from the Holly Randall interview.
Moved to mainspace by Launchballer(talk) and SanDiegoDan(talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 308 past nominations.
Overall: Everything looks good except for my one minor complaint. QPQ is done. Hook is interesting as the careers could be polar opposites to some. The image looks fine to me, but Launchballer has expressed interest in changing it, so that could be up to him as he wishes. He was also correct about the fiasco of DYK check claiming it is older than it is. Locust member (talk) 16:27, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Cox in October 2022
Thanks. I organised the crop, by the way; I also added a duplicate cite. I'm currently working on the American MILF expansion and will ping when done.--Launchballer22:34, 16 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Awesome, everything looks good. American MILF has an earwig report of 9.1%, which is great. No issues with the article, both hooks look good, but am obviously happy to pass ALT1 (with the cropped picture). Locust member (talk) 15:52, 20 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
Comment: An admin has now created a redirect a the Serenity Cox title. It will still take an admin's intervention to publish this draft. • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Everything looks good except for my one minor complaint. QPQ is done. Hook is interesting as the careers could be polar opposites to some. The image looks fine to me, but Launchballer has expressed interest in changing it, so that could be up to him as he wishes. He was also correct about the fiasco of DYK check claiming it is older than it is. Locust member (talk) 16:27, 15 July 2025 (UTC).png)