Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Segregation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Cnilep in topic Broad concept article may be warranted
[edit]

I removed the link to Ethnic segregation from the Segregation page because it redirects to the Racial segregation page. This is redundant, and so serves no purpose. If there was an actual Ethnic segregation page, I would have gladly left the link alone. As it was/is, the Ethnic segregation link was just misleading. Also, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. As the sentence in the link does not more than define it, the phrase is unnecessary as well. Thank you for trying to point out a mistake to me. In the future, please also point out why it is a mistake. Thank you! Darius4 08:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Metals

[edit]

A link to metals and MSE related "Phase segregation" would be good. --Meawoppl 03:06, 27 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reorganize

[edit]

A brief defintion followed by putting things first, followed by neutral practices, followed by social practices. Just less confusing for average reader. Probably should have subsections to make it even clearer, like "substances" and "practices" or something. CarolMooreDC (talk) 17:02, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Broad concept article may be warranted

[edit]

I have styled this page according to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages since, by all appearances, it is intended as a DAB page. That meant, for example, removing the {{segregation}} template. However, a broad concept article may be called for, discussing segregation by race, gender, etc. In that case, this page should be moved to Segregation (disambiguation) (over the redirect), since it will still be necessary to disambiguate particle segregation and the like. Cnilep (talk) 05:25, 4 December 2013 (UTC)Reply