Talk:Satyashodhak Samaj
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related to caste-related topics in South Asia, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
| Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. The entire article relates to the following contentious topics:
The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
untitled
[edit]I am going to recreate this article, because the article,which is already here, does not meet with the importance of the subject. Shivashree (talk) 06:57, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Satyashodhak Samaj in 21st century
[edit]Is the Satyashodhak Samaj still active? If not, then when did it stop its activities?Please add this information to the article if you have reliable sources to back it up.Thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 20:36, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- Good point Jonathansammy. I just checked out the 'Non-Brahmin movement' from the library. Will see if it has any information. Thanks-Acharya63 (talk) 01:36, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- I think the article is going off at a tangent. There may be similarities between the non-Brahmin movement and the SS but anything about the movement post-Phule is effectively about the movement as a movement rather than about the SS. It should be in a separate article. - Sitush (talk) 19:49, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Prabhus
[edit]The footnote about the Prabhus is pure synthesis. We can't do that. - Sitush (talk) 19:31, 14 May 2018 (UTC)