Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiltshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wiltshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WiltshireWikipedia:WikiProject WiltshireTemplate:WikiProject WiltshireWiltshire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
·--216.109.0.5 (talk) 13:42, 24 September 2010 (UTC)A very light-weight page. Strange to use a picture of a megalithic monument in an article concerning the lithotype itself. I'll have to see what I got last week at Avebury ... nothing close-up of the stones themselves, unfortunately. Something I'll have to remember next time I'm down there.Reply
Searching Jnl.Geol.Soc.Lond, I come up with the following sarsen-related papers:
E. C. Spicer "Sarsen-Stones in a Claypit" Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society v61: pp39-42.
George Maw "On the Occurrence of Consolidated Blocks in the Drift of Suffolk" Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society v23: pp110-114. I'll see what I can do to update the article. Aidan Karley (talk) 09:49, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
the sarsen stones are 6 centimeters squared and 21ft tall→Reply
