Talk:Santos

Manual of style

"The description associated with a link should be kept to a minimum, just sufficient to allow the reader to find the correct link." is true. However, "minimum" must still be long enough to allow the reader to find the correct link. The correct link is the blue one (each entry needs to have a blue link), and shortening the description to remove the only blue link is a bad idea. Also, keep the group header formatting in line with the MOS, etc. -- JHunterJ (talk) 21:33, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

• I don't consider "one of the Guyanan football clubs with a player on the Guyana national football team" to be a useful description of that team. The player concerned has no article either. Since each line needs a bluelink, I've deleted the line.
• Though the example at MOS:DAB#Longer lists uses the group header formatting "In X" rather than "X", I don't think the implication is that all DABs must use "In X". In many cases a bare X reads better (e.g. "In other" vs Other"; "In people" vs "People").

jnestorius^(talk) 22:50, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

I don't mind if the entry is deleted, although I was considering the intent of the editor who added it in the first place when finding a blue link to use. If you disagree with the implication that all dabs must use "In X:", that's one thing. "In other" should indeed be fixed, to "In other uses:", and "In people:" doesn't read worse that "People:" -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:54, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Santos, São Paulo which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 21:15, 18 August 2011 (UTC)