Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Salem witch trials

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by ~2026-35670-82 in topic Incomplete information
Former good articleSalem witch trials was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 12, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
January 21, 2008Good article nomineeListed
December 16, 2010Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 1, 2004, September 19, 2004, September 19, 2005, September 19, 2006, September 19, 2007, March 1, 2011, and March 1, 2016.
Current status: Delisted good article

New edit in the first passage

[edit]

I added a sentence in the very first passage of the article that I sourced and made sure I wasn't paraphrasing,"Not everyone who was accused during that time had a known residency...were able to be traced back to twenty-five different New England communities." I used this source that seems reliable after having gone through it:[1], "The Long and Short of Salem Witchcraft: Chronology and Collective Violence in 1692"HowIgethere (talk) 22:00, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. Latner, Richard (2008). "The Long and Short of Salem Witchcraft: Chronology and Collective Violence in 1692". Journal of Social History. 42 (1): 137–156. doi:10.1353/jsh.0.0056. JSTOR 25096601.

Semi-protected edit request on 11 September 2025

[edit]

Change: In January 2016, the University of Virginia announced its Gallows Hill Project team had determined the execution site in Salem

To: In January 2016, the University of Virginia, in cooperation with Salem State University, announced its Gallows Hill Project team had determined the execution site in Salem MACrotty (talk) 17:28, 11 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Day Creature (talk) 22:43, 11 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 4 October 2025

[edit]

Uh, hello? Add a link to the Crucible. How has no one done this already? 2600:1008:A117:4798:B852:284B:DB9C:8510 (talk) 20:35, 4 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Already done Already listed in "further reading" section. Nubzor [T][C] 20:53, 4 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect Citation

[edit]

Citation 8 (Narratives of the Witchcraft Cases) incorrectly states it is quoting page 195, when the quote comes from page 197. Minor change needed, I am unfortunately not well versed enough to edit the reference list GamzIrl (talk) 15:06, 19 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, changed as requested Edmund Patrick confer 22:26, 19 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Incomplete information

[edit]

There is great detail in the research. However, toward the end it states, “On September 22, 1692 8 more persons were executed”. The names nor any information about the last 8 was included. This seems to be a gross error. ~2026-35670-82 (talk) 03:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply