Talk:SafeCatch
Add topicLatest comment: 16 years ago by SarekOfVulcan in topic Name
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Expand the Article
[edit]I read about this in the news and couldn't find too much information about it. Please help by adding more information that would be helpful. Chinese3126 00:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Notability tag?
[edit]The notability tag was added without any contextual information or comment here on talk. The article has three unique sources from notable publications; perhaps the tagger could provide more specific guidance as to what exactly is missing? Anchoress 23:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- I did a Google search which reported "about 61 hits". Then I did another one which got 1400+ hits. Now I just did one again which is returning "67 for Safecatch". I don't quite understand what's going on with that. Ewlyahoocom 01:24, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know, that's weird. But either way, we don't use raw google numbers to establish or discount notability. Anchoress 04:10, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, that's why the tag reads "...please expand or rewrite the article to establish its notability." Ewlyahoocom 07:42, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Could you please be a bit more specific? Could you identify what's missing? Thanks for reiterating the content of the tag, but that doesn't really answer my question. Thanks a lot! Anchoress 07:53, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- One of the external links is dead but a Google news search lists a single article at http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/valleyindependent/teenscene/s_530174.html So how long has it been since this... concept? program? (I'm not actually sure what it is) was developed? 1 year according to Wikipedia, but 2 years according to that Google news article -- are there any studies documenting its results (besides Carr's self-reported results)? It's says it's a Washington State program -- does it have an official website? (One other thing -- is it "Safecatch" or "SafeCatch" with an uppercase C)? Ewlyahoocom 08:10, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Could you please be a bit more specific? Could you identify what's missing? Thanks for reiterating the content of the tag, but that doesn't really answer my question. Thanks a lot! Anchoress 07:53, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, that's why the tag reads "...please expand or rewrite the article to establish its notability." Ewlyahoocom 07:42, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know, that's weird. But either way, we don't use raw google numbers to establish or discount notability. Anchoress 04:10, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Name
[edit]Why is the article titled "SafeCatch"? None of the references have a medial capital C. Languagehat (talk) 16:24, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- The Credit Union Management article uses it. I'm not sure which is correct, though. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:41, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Law enforcement articles
- Mid-importance Law enforcement articles
- WikiProject Law Enforcement articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class FBI articles
- Mid-importance FBI articles
- WikiProject FBI articles
- WikiProject United States articles