Talk:SURBL
Add topic| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]Does anyone know who runs this? I clicked on a link (i knew it was spam i was just curious) and i got the message, "Unable to complete forwarding for xxxxx.com. Destination is listed as spam:- Blocked, xxxxx.com on lists [ob], See: http://www.surbl.org/lists.html." Its got to be a pretty powerful organization if they're filtering what i can and can't see on the internet.
They don't control what you can see or can't see on the Internet. Your or someone else's mail provider is likely using the list to filter out spam.
Also, this article is not well-written, and does not provide a great deal of information on what an SURBL is. It's more just an argument between two people than anything else.Plitero (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
I agree completely, the article is not up to Wikipedia's usual standards. I'm going to {{cleanup}} the page for now and if nobody has altered it I'll pop back to do the job when I've time later. Sardaukar86 (talk) 00:41, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
[edit]
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.surbl.org/lists. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Tenshi! (Talk page) 23:10, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
This is Scam
[edit]Like the older Discussion at Topic "Untitled" points to, this very likely seems to be scam in itself.
Nobody knows, who is responsible for this. There is no Imprint or legal notice on the webpage. But there is a hint: the contact page points to "Authorized Resellers", which is securityZONES.net. -> So they resell the data that each person who tried to "delist" his domain, had transmitted. This and the fact, that my brand new domain, got "blacklisted", is showing me, that there is no blacklist, but a whitelist for people, who paid with their data to get "unlocked". This is simply a scam, to collect and sell data. It seems like the reputation of this "thing" is quite positive - but that doesn't mean anything as long as there are no closer details about this publicly available. Has anyone more background info about that organization?
The article itself is very poor too. It does only spread the narrative, that the organization itself claims, but is in lack of any real facts about the organization. Who is an charge of SURBL? What Kind of organization is it? It's mentioned to be "Surbl BV" in the Netherlands, but then there should be an official registration that can be referenced - missing too. What about the connection to "securityZONES"? 2003:D7:1F25:8900:4615:7FDB:42C5:1E8B (talk) 10:47, 4 August 2025 (UTC)