Talk:SAP S/4HANA

Requested move 19 November 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved by SwisterTwister. Jenks24 (talk) 08:47, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

---

4HANA → SAP S/4HANA – article about SAP S/4HANA recently went live but with an incorrect title of "4HANA". So the “S/” is missing from the title, the "S/" is important because it signifies that it is a “suite” of software. Somewhere along the editing, someone removed the "S/". The page should be called "SAP S/4HANA" (you will see the rest of the article refers to it as SAP S/4HANA too), I would like to request a page move in order to correct this title. Thanks! Olivia0452 (talk) 17:50, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

I suggest that we instead move it ot the "full" name of "SAP Business Suite 4 SAP HANA" which avoids the issues with a name containing a slash, and is less cryptic as well. Olivia0452, would you object to this? If not, I will do the move. DES ^(talk) 23:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

@DESiegel: What if we try to cover all bases and do the following as the title: SAP Business Suite 4 SAP HANA (SAP S/4HANA) . Would that work too? Olivia0452 (talk) 09:09, 20 November 2015 (UTC)Olivia0452

Olivia0452 the whole point of my suggestion is to avoid the presence of a "/" character in the article title, because that causes technical problems, being interpreted by the software to indicate a sub page in the corresponding talk page name. Putting the slashed form in the article itself will allow searches to find it, and a redirect could also be created, as that wouldn't have the talk page issue. DES ^(talk) 13:46, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Custom HTML Table

I'm going to move the custom HTML table unless there are any objections. - AndAllForWhat? (talk) 05:33, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

• remove

AndAllForWhat? (talk) 05:33, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Please do. That entire section probably deserves some more scrutiny, given that they're the only contributions from the two accounts that made them... and tagged them as minor edits! ~2026-33358-64 (talk) 10:40, 5 June 2026 (UTC)