Talk:Ryman Healthcare

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Potential COI?

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I believe there may be a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest from one of the users editing this article. It lacks a neutral tone, and has some very specific claims without any citations. I can't find any good sources online for some of those claims, which suggests it might be internal company information.

At the very least the article could do with a good clean-up to remove unsourced claims and puffery. 103.8.18.128 (talk) 02:17, 14 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Potential COI?