Talk:Ryan Reynolds/GA1
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 750h+ in topic GA review
GA review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: 750h+ (talk · contribs) 05:34, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Alexeyevitch (talk · contribs) 11:06, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
I'm happy to do this review. I will be using the template below. Alexeyevitch(talk) 11:06, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Alexeyevitch: 'titular character' is used in several actor/actress FAs. MOS:SUBMARINE says "unexpectedly hide relevant information underneath the link's label"; linking titular character is not unexpected as the reader should expect it to link to the titular character's page. 750h+ 02:34, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- OK. Alexeyevitch(talk) 02:51, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Alexeyevitch: [30] has an archive next to it, others have been fixed. 750h+ 10:21, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- OK. Alexeyevitch(talk) 02:51, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
| 1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Grammar
Spelling
Prose
| |
| 1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
| 2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
| 2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
| |
| 2c. it contains no original research. |
| |
| 2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
| |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
| 3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
| |
| 3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
| |
| 4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
| |
| 5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
| |
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
| 6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
| 6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
| |
| 7. Overall assessment. | Looking back over stuff, this article well-formatted and sourced and meets the criteria now. Well done. | |