Talk:Rust (song)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Alternative music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Unsourced?

Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I added this to the article a while ago, and it was reverted as being 'unsourced':

"The lyrics and music for its refrain are borrowed from McCulloch's 1992 b-side song "Ribbons and Chains"."

I believe the information is relevant, and is certainly factually correct (the two songs have the same refrain - same melody and lyrics), so how can it be put back in so it will stay? I mean how (and perhaps why) does one cite a source for something that is plainly evident?

Shill66 (talk) 21:12, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Without a reliable source to verify your claim it is classed as original research. Wikipedia can only accept information from reliable third party sources. --JD554 (talk) 07:07, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the answer. A quick Google search finds a variety of comments about the re-use of the lyric/music, so if I cite this, for example: http://www.angelfire.com/wy2/discog/page3.html it will pass the test? Shill66 (talk) 20:42, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

No I'm afraid not. It would need to be from a reliable source: such as a newspaper, magagazine, etc. The website you've provided is a self-published fansite. --JD554 (talk) 07:11, 22 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Unsourced?