Talk:Rule of Three (Wicca)
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rule of Three (Wicca) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.png){kind=small}
Anthroposophy
[edit]Being as this is an article on 'Rule of Three (Wicca)', specifically, I would propose that the section titled "Anthroposophy" does not belong here and should be removed. It is not relevant Rule of Three (Wicca) and this is not a space for comparison of supposedly similar principles in other works, philosophies, and religions. This article is specifically for the "rule of three" in Wicca. Being as there is no connection between the article's subject and Anthroposophy, that section should be removed from this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.67.79.87 (talk) 19:49, 10 December 2021 (UTC) ---Article has been adited to remove the "Anthroposophy" section, in line with above observation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.67.73.51 (talk) 23:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Correct interpretation?
[edit]Where it says "when thou receivest good, so equally art bound to return good threefold" does not seem to say that one will get threefold good return but that one is bound to return/do threefold good. Of course, the English is weird, but this seems to be what it means, not what the article appears to say (skimming). Original author explanation available? Misty MH (talk) 05:15, 18 January 2023 (UTC)