Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I noticed that an energy data company, Rextag, listed the pipeline as being 683 miles long, not 680. The original project summary in the reference section calls it "approximately 680 miles," which does not preclude it being longer. The Reuters reference also calls it 680 miles long, but they may be using the same round number from the project summary. Unless a better source can be found, the Rextag data seems like the best source to me. But I realize not everyone may agree. --GentlemanGhost(séance)05:12, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
