Talk:Ruben Talberg

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 21:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Notability

The biography is not relevant. The performed galleries do not exist, or are paid-up galleries. Price-lists do not belong in WP. There exist no relevant exhibitions or Feulleton articles about Ruben Talberg. SA? Stardust8888 (talk) 00:41, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

If you do not believe that the individual meets the notability criteria for inclusion, you could start an deletion discussion. --Jezebel'sPonyo^shhh 15:10, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Have a look at the press section on artist's website for numerous reviews and press articles.. the performed galleries existed or are still in business. For example, Jewish Museum, Worms exhibiton 2009 was well received in public / press. Auction houses like Ketterer Kunst, Munich (largest in Germany) auction artist's works for years. Upcoming Phillips de Pury & Company auction autumn 2010. The artist NEVER paid for a gallery exhibit. Its biased opinion to assume that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.210.147.185 (talk) 16:41, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Regardless of 'bias', real or imagined, the article is devoid of the independent sourcing from published reliable sources that is required of a Wikipedia article. Actual sources, not vague claims that they can be found somewhere. As it stands, it lacks necessary evidence that it meets the relevant Wikipedia notability criteria. AndyTheGrump (talk) 07:12, 10 April 2026 (UTC)