Talk:Rondebosch Fountain
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Spencerco1 in topic Reference [14] Regarding the Macfarlane catalogue broken
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rondebosch Fountain article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is written in South African English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A fact from Rondebosch Fountain appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 January 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Reference [14] Regarding the Macfarlane catalogue broken
[edit]The current reference needs a functioning link, as the current link routes to a 404 error. Spencerco1 (talk) 01:13, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
