Talk:Role-oriented programming
Add topic | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
I can only barely tell what this means, and I suggest it needs to be re-written or cut: "In the older literature and in the field of databases, it seems that there has been little consideration for the context in which roles interplay with each other. Such a context is being established in newer role- and aspect-oriented programming languages such as Object Teams."
I think the substantive content is something like "Thinking in terms of Roles or Aspects arose only recently in the context of object-oriented programing".
The non-substantive content is: databases==old! databases==bad!
Start a discussion about improving the Role-oriented programming page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Role-oriented programming" page.