Talk:Robert Frodeman

Comment

This page was made by professor Frodeman himself, making it not NPOV and autobiographical. Also, there's nothing establishing his significance. Smeggysmeg 07:42, 8 November 2007 (UTC) More precisely, the page was made by a team of people at UNT in 2007.

His significance is attested to in, e.g., Mark Coeckelbergh's "Introduction to Philosophy of Technology" (New York: Oxford University Press, 2020), pp. 258-259: "Robert Frodeman is ... an expert in environmental ethics and public policy, and a promoter of interdisciplinary research." (Yes, I have co-authored with Frodeman, but I don't think that undermines my objectivity in this regard.) Cmitcham (talk) 15:59, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

I might add that his GoogleScholar h-index of 34 is further positive evidence. Cmitcham (talk) 16:02, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Sources

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL --Malcolmxl5 08:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protectionor whatever

I think this thing is supposed to go here instead of the main page Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Robert Frodeman (talk) 14:15, 24 October 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.124.180.15 (talk)

Unsourced since 2007.

Is Frodeman actually WP:Notable? -Roxy the grumpy dog. wooF 14:22, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

His former position would indicate he is. However, other than material written BY him, there's no evidence his career was noticed by anyone else. Cabayi (talk) 13:13, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

There are plenty of articles on Jstor which he authored himself, but beyond that I've never heard of the gentleman personally. Wolf-013 (talk) 21:25, 12 October 2021 (UTC)