Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Rittnerbahn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Vegaswikian in topic Requested move

Funicular

[edit]

The article tells us that the rack section of the tramway was replaced by a funicular. But then the gallery goes on to show the following picture of the funicular:

As that photograph clearly does not show a funicular, I have removed the image from the gallery. But I'm left wondering if the editor who wrote the text knew what a funicular was. Is it possible that the picture is a genuine depiction of the mode of transport that replace the rack tram, and it is the article text that is wrong. Anybody know?.

-- Starbois (talk) 16:37, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

this is definitely not the new funicular because
  • a) it is not a funicular that is being built but a tricable areal ropeway
  • b) the image shows the cabin of the old ropeway that went from Bozen to Oberbozen (the new cabins: http://www.stol.it/nachrichten/img_show.asp?imgId=96990)
  • c) there never was a funicular on the Ritten (the tramway was replaced by a ropeway in 1966)
therefore the article needs fixing - which I will do now, --noclador (talk) 17:24, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for clarifying that. I hope you don't mind, but I've replaced your link target (but not text) with a link to Aerial tramway. This is, I think, the correct article for what is being described here. The term ropeway is a better one in my opinion, but the article Ropeway is about a piece of naval equipment. -- Starbois (talk) 18:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
No problem at all - you're welcome and aerial tramway is fine - as long as people understand what it is all about. In May the new ropeway will be opened, if I have the time I will stop by and take a series of pics for commons; best regards --noclador (talk) 20:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 03:25, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply



Ritten RailwayRittnerbahn — The majority of English-language publications refer to this line by this name (the most common of the two official names, the other being Italian, as this part of Italy is bilingual), so WP:EN supports using this Germanic name, not an English translation of it. I am the editor who added (all four of) what are currently the article's only English citations, and all refer to it (in English text) as the Rittnerbahn. Additional English-language sources I've not cited in the article (including travel guides) also support this move. SJ Morg (talk) 07:21, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.