Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
A fact from Right to sit appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 November2021(check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that workers have the right to sit in some jurisdictions?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Alright, this article is new enough, long enough, cited well, and no copyvio detected (2.9% similarity). The hook is short enough, interesting enough, and "cited" in the article (it's the entire article). Finally, QPQ done. Nice job, non-digital source and non-English source accepted in good faith. Heythereimaguy (talk) 00:20, 29 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Regarding the map at the beginning of the About section, the American, Canadian, and Australian provinces that have right to sit laws (dark green) should be changed from dark green to light green, because the map key says that areas labeled with dark green have right to sit laws at the national level, which cannot be the case since these provinces are not nations. KraljLavova97 (talk) 20:20, 31 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Alright, this article is new enough, long enough, cited well, and no copyvio detected (2.9% similarity). The hook is short enough, interesting enough, and "cited" in the article (it's the entire article). Finally, QPQ done. Nice job, non-digital source and non-English source accepted in good faith. Heythereimaguy (talk) 00:20, 29 October 2021 (UTC)