Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Rickardite

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Chris.urs-o in topic Chemical formula

Chemical formula

[edit]

Forman and Peacock give a completely different forumula and cite other sources that contradict the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.138.85.162 (talk) 21:28, 17 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Don't know 'bout Forman and Peacock, but I've added an alternate formula sourced to the Handbook of Mineralogy. Vsmith (talk) 01:15, 18 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
RRUFF Database: Cu(2.64-3.00)Te2
Ford W E (1903) Rickardite, a new mineral, The American Journal of Science 165, 69-70
The chemical formula didn't get a revision later on.
Well, mindat.org cites: Forman, S.A.; Peacock, Martin Alfred (1949). American Mineralogist. 34: 441–451 http://www.minsocam.org/ammin/AM34/AM34_441.pdf. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help), Acta Crystallographica: B49: 398-403, Mineralogical Journal (Japan) (1973): 7: 252. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 02:25, 18 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
We follow Rruff database/ IMA --Chris.urs-o (talk) 11:36, 25 January 2013 (UTC)Reply