Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Richard Labunski

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Tomwsulcer in topic About the tags

Created article

[edit]

If you, reading this, work for U.Kentucky or for Richard Labunski and have a picture, please upload it to Wikimedia Commons, with proper permissions, and leave a message here with the exact filename. And I'll try to include it. Does anybody know RL's birthday? --Tomwsulcer (talk) 03:19, 2 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

About the tags

[edit]

I agree. The article is not neutral. Please check this. Does read like an autobiography. Let's get rid of the WP:SPAM. --Tomwsulcer (talk) 20:11, 9 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

I trimmed much of the excess unreferenced less-than-notable stuff to try to fix problems mentioned by the other editor; I agree Wikipedia is not an advertisement. I'm wondering whether the long list of publications is necessary; maybe they can be removed also? Someone interested in more specific writings could find them via the RL website link, right? The core story of this Wikipedia article is: an important professor calling for serious political reform -- a second constitutional convention. I don't think a book about James Madison is that notable. And I think this is a serious story worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia; still, other editors might want to weigh in on whether RL is notable -- I think his call for a convention is the notable thing. Plus he has an interesting background -- journalism, then academia. But I suggest keeping the tags on until other editors are happy that problems have been fixed.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 02:57, 10 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
It's been two weeks now with the tags in place, and no comments from other editors. I think the non-book publications section is unnecessary -- this information can be accessed via RL's website for those readers interested. With this trimming, I think the article is back to its NPOV status, and I'll keep watching it to keep out the WP:SPAM. And I'll remove the tags for the time being; if other editors think the tags are still necessary, please reinstall them.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 13:48, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply