Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Richard Cordray

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Extraordinary Writ in topic WP:URFA/2020
Former featured articleRichard Cordray is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 2, 2009.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 8, 2008Good article nomineeListed
December 21, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
January 2, 2009Today's featured articleMain Page
September 26, 2026Featured article reviewDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 21, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Ohio State Treasurer Richard Cordray is a five-time undefeated Jeopardy! champion and carried the Olympic Torch in 1996?
Current status: Former featured article

older comments

[edit]

Hello! I'm the director of new media for the Cordray for Attorney General campaign. I just wanted to let you guys know that our campaign site is up here: www.CordrayforOhio.com. I think this would be a good addition to the list of external links.

If you have any questions, please contact me at erie@cordrayforohio.com

Thanks! Erie 68.252.41.254 (talk) 15:55, 15 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Funny line

[edit]

I'd like to remove or very much modify a line in Richard_Cordray#Early_legislative_career: "As a state representative from 1991 to 1992, Cordray legislated against crime, on behalf of the environment, and for the protection of children and families." This differentiates him from those other legislators who favored crime, wanted to pollute, and hated children and families? It reads like blatant boosterism. --Milkbreath (talk) 16:13, 30 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's also not clear whether this refers to a voting record or bills Cordray drafted or sponsored. Good candidate for modification. Robert K S (talk) 04:42, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Teaching career?

[edit]

In the lead: "Throughout most of his career he has continued to teach courses at law schools." There is no reference for this statement and no further mention of it in the article body. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:56, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I know this comment is old, but you're right. I've gone ahead and removed the sentence from the lead, since it clearly doesn't belong there with no further discussion in the body. If he has indeed continued to teach at law schools, the information should be added to the body of the article along with sources for the info. Tytrain (talk) 21:39, 25 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Brasenose College

[edit]

According to Lincolnite (talk · contribs) Cordray attended Brasenose College, but he can not confirm so we are withholding this from the article.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:42, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

i-5 bar trivia

[edit]

On 25 Sept user Freontec added the following information to the "Personal" section of the article:

During a visit to Huron, OH on September 24, 2009, Mr. Cordray participated in live team trivia at the i-5's establishment. At the end of a 26-question game his team finished sixth out of eleven teams. The winning team that night, interestingly enough, was Team Marc Dann

I had previously removed this information when Freontec inserted it into the lead of the article.

I believe that this information, without a reliable third-party citation which sets it in proper context, is trivia, which should not be included in articles per WP:Trivia.

Freontec, please feel free to reply below as to why you feel this information should be included. Please provide a valid citation as well. If needed, we can then get some third-party users to weigh in so that we can avoid WP:3RR. Tytrain (talk) 21:29, 25 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

resource

[edit]

99.19.45.187 (talk) 05:23, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richard Cordray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Cordray awarded Oxford Varsity Blue in Basketball

[edit]

What is the significance of this. Oxford is in Great Britain... do they even have a basketball program, is it a sort of "club" what league do they play in. Issue is ... if this were a U.S. university say like Ohio State and he won a scarlet and gray letter in basketball would mean that he was on the varsity team which is significant. British schools don't play competitive basketball in a league. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danleywolfe (talk • contribs) 19:32, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Richard Cordray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:46, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Richard Cordray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:20, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richard Cordray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:38, 7 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hatch Act violations

[edit]

Hey y'all! Pinging @Roseohioresident: on this. Per WP:PRIMARY, this really shouldn't be used and it doesn't show any notability about the event. I think that a much better source to use would be from the Plain Dealer here: .

Candidly though, this doesn't really seem that notable either way in the course of his overall biography where it sits right now-- "He was accused by conservative watchdogs of violating the Hatch Act but the Office of Special Counsel cleared him of all wrongdoing" isn't really... anything. It's just kind of like, there was this weird fish hunt and it didn't turn up anything. Per WP:BLP, "Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion" so I removed it. I still think it should stay removed but I think there should be discussion on it too. Nomader (talk) 16:12, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

I put it in a NPOV fashion and edited the article, hopefully is better now! Nomader (talk) 16:19, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

WP:URFA/2020

[edit]

I don't think this article continues to meet the featured article criteria. Cordray has done a lot of notable things since the 2008 FAC, but (as often happens with FA BLPs) they've been added piecemeal in a way that's resulted in an unbalanced article with due-weight problems. For instance, we get very little information about several of his runs for statewide office; we get three paragraphs on a minor lawsuit against Bank of America (but little information on Cordray's actual role in it and no information on how the case was actually resolved); and we get more details about every twist and turn in his nomination to the CFPB than about what he actually did in five years as director. There are also some questionable sources that have accumulated over the years (press releases, an amicus brief, etc.), and there are various other little things (e.g., the paragraph on Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette doesn't link to that article or tell us how the Supreme Court actually resolved the issue). If these concerns aren't addressed, the article may be nominated at WP:FAR, where editors will discuss whether to remove its FA status. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:19, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply