Talk:Ricercar
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Commander Keane in topic Inappropriate for anything; much less an "encyclopedia"
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Inappropriate for anything; much less an "encyclopedia"
[edit]"For cars referred to as "ricers", see Rice burner."
Wow. And Wikpedia has the nerve to ask for money. SMH. 2601:600:A480:4C20:7064:6796:6EAB:939C (talk) 03:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- I can see your point. Our page Wikipedia:HATMISSPELL covers the issue somewhat, saying that "These hatnotes should only be used when the ambiguity exists for a significant portion of the readership". Is that the case here? Maybe not, the IP doesn't seem to think so (I am interpretting) and I think it is a stretch. Maybe it is a language issue for Japanese speakers, but then again do they make up a significant portion of readership? Pending further discussion I have no problem removing it. Commander Keane (talk) 04:11, 29 October 2024 (UTC)