Talk:Research exemption
Add topicLatest comment: 17 years ago by Terry0051 in topic Research exemption not the same as 35 USC 271(e)(1) 'safe harbor'
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Research exemption not the same as 35 USC 271(e)(1) 'safe harbor'
[edit]There is a difference between the "research exemption" and the Safe Harbor under 271(e)(1). The Supreme Court did not address whether there is a "research exemption" in Merck v. Integra, so it is not correct to put the two together. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.110.195.114 (talk • contribs)
- I entirely agree with the previous comment. The two bases of defence have different origins and different scope. The main article proceeds from a misconception. But it's hardly practical to give a good careful account of this without the thing being out of order as including OR. There's a similar dichotomy in the laws of some other countries outside the US, too. I can't see a prospect of getting this subject into good shape here. Terry0051 (talk) 23:38, 7 May 2009 (UTC)