Talk:Rephormula
Add topicLatest comment: 17 years ago by Cannibaloki in topic Title?
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 3 April 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Title?
[edit]Shouldn't the title of this article actually be Phormula (with a redirect for Rephormula)? I'd make the change myself but I thought I'd see whether anyone else thought there were compelling reasons for not doing this. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 09:35, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- As writer of the article, I have the impression that Rephormula is more notable than Phormula.--Cannibaloki 15:31, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- This is really tricky because I do basically agree with you, given the labels involved and whatever. However, that's not really my point. The album's title is Phormula... meh. I'm not sure I really care enough about this. It just looks a little odd that the article is titled after the reissue of an album. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 15:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- I think it would be a good alternative, ask about the correct title for this release in the talk page of WikiProject Albums.--Cannibaloki 17:14, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- This is really tricky because I do basically agree with you, given the labels involved and whatever. However, that's not really my point. The album's title is Phormula... meh. I'm not sure I really care enough about this. It just looks a little odd that the article is titled after the reissue of an album. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 15:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)