Talk:Repetition
Add topicLatest comment: 2 months ago by Razzwakes in topic Listing by name, not concept?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Repetition page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Vague intro?
[edit]I'm surprised no one has commented here. So, um, I'll start!:)
Should the opening sentance (and I really like that there's only one) say "immediately occurred before" or "before in the same context," to avoid confusion? Mayhap it's a little too vague the way it is.
- Repetition need not be immediate and may occur in a different context. Those things help make repetition perceivable, but do not make it possible. Hyacinth 10:36, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Split page up?
[edit]This article seems to refer to vastly by SineBot-->
Why does "mesodiplosis" redirect here?
[edit]Listing by name, not concept?
[edit]It looks like it mostly lists things that have the name “Repetition,” not things that are actually about repetition as a concept. Adding a short note could help avoid confusion. Razzwakes (talk) 22:55, 6 May 2026 (UTC)