Talk:Relentless Software

WP:VG Assessment

Missing content

• Background of its founders (What skill sets did David Amor and Andrew Eades have and bring to their creation? This can be helpful in context.)
• Headcount, organization (especially the first)
• Location, office setup
• Culture (its motto is, somewhat, in the History section)
• Private or publicly listed company?
• Any notable contributions besides video games (prominent charity events, or community projects)?

Improvements to be made

• Copyediting required: "Amor and Eades persuaded SCEE [...] Much to their shock, SCEE agreed [...]" — "persuaded" would have meant they successfully done so, hence the later clause would be redundant; furthermore, "much to their shock" is informal and unencyclopaedic. Various "noun plus -ing" issues (refer to User:Tony1/Advanced editing exercises#A common problem—noun plus -ing. Several one- or two-sentence paragraphs. MOS violations (no "&" please).

Missing content is the primary reason for my grading of this as "C"-class. The company's relatively small scale notability and its single product line leaves its importance to the WP:VG project as low. Jappalang (talk) 00:48, 5 November 2008 (UTC)