Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Relatively hyperbolic group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Suhagja in topic Relative to what?

Coned off graph

[edit]

I removed the following sentence:

" If H is a normal subgroup then the coned off Cayley graph is the same as the quotient graph of Γ(G) by the action of H. "

as it is wrong. It is probably correct to say that in this case the coned off Cayley graph is quasi-isometric to the quotient graph, but it is certainly not the same. (Consider the case H = G.)

JF Manning (talk) 19:59, 18 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Relative to what?

[edit]

From the examples section:

  • The mapping class group of an orientable finite type surface is either hyperbolic (when 3g+n<5, where g is the genus and n is the number of punctures) or is not relatively hyperbolic.
  • The automorphism group and the outer automorphism group of a free group of finite rank at least 3 are not relatively hyperbolic.

These statements do not really make sense as long as one does not explicite relative to which subgroups those groups are not relativley hyperbolic.--Suhagja (talk) 16:13, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply